If you needed more evidence that projects within organizations are being thought of as strategic activities rather than as mere operational activities consider this PR Newswire: Report Defines How Project Management Execs are becoming New Corporate Chiefs. We are not surprised when we observe firms with strong project orientation create a Chief Project Officer role. Yet we were surprised to find this happening at the New York Times. Drake Associates has had experience with several publishers (college text books, travel guides, online media) having worked as contract project managers on their internal projects. We found that the industry is more prosaic, traditional and process oriented than project oriented. It is not surprising to see CPOs in aerospace, A&E or health care where Project Managers are already highly regarded, highly compensated and given considerable operational authority and strategic influence. The path to this C-level position according to the article:
The people who are being identified as "chief project officers" in these organizations may have different titles or backgrounds, but their charge is the same: They're being given full authority to take all the steps needed to ensure consistent alignment of their organizations' project management activities with corporate-level strategic objectives and goals.
Project management itself is being viewed more strategically within organizations. It is no longer seen as just an operational activity. And it can't be; there is just too much at stake. The trend is showing that it's slowly morphing into a C-level role. When asked if she sees this trend continuing, Beth Partleton, Director of Project Management at Miller Brewing Company replied, "This is definitely the trend, it has to be, when you implement your strategy through projects."
So does your organization need a Chief Project Officer? As project managers and executive consultants we don't see the need for more chiefs. In fact, we're not even fans of Project Management Offices - a highly popular implementation by organizations trying to bring the discipline and techniques of project management to a wider array of operational processes. PMOs work well where they are part of start-up efforts - there from the beginning - or when the organization is already project oriented. Organizations that are process or operationally oriented will find the development and installation of a PMO counterproductive. If a CPO is needed "to ensure consistent alignment of their organizations' project management activities with corporate-level strategic objectives and goals", the organization doesn't need a CPO - they need better leadership.
For those organizations that want to adapt PM traits and processes, a better use of the resources and effort to build a PMO is simply to train those areas outside of product development with the rudiments of project management. Unless the organization has a project orientation where they are acquainted with and using project management methods and procedures in most of their activities, the company is not ready for a PMO. PMOs are not a viable vehicle for changing an organization's culture and that is what is called for in an organization moving from an operational orientation to a project orientation.
The formality that goes along with "Office" or Department status creates its own set of problems - the focus shifts from being effective (getting things done) to being efficient (getting things done cheaply). It codifies and promulgates methods and processes which then get applied indiscriminately. It substitutes procedure for thinking through alternatives, making trade-offs and taking steps to mitigate risks. It makes the organization more risk averse as performance incentives change from doing the right thing to doing it the right way. And in inhibits learning as nothing outside of the approved means and methods are tried or considered.
We recommend that our clients consider projects as strategic initiatives. That is, if it isn't a high risk, high reward strategic activity, it doesn't get elevated to the status of a project. Most capital improvements, upgrade, replacement and maintenance activities, adopting the most popular ERP software or extending product lines can be treated with project management methods, but we don't consider these strategic activities. They can be managed as projects, but they are operational in scope. The goals and objectives of projects must be to provide new and unique capabilities or products that cannot be easily replicated by competitors. Projects should result in new methods or business lines that are defensible and provide a competitive advantage. The very best resources in the organization need to be assigned to projects. If the resources don't exist in-house then go outside and rent them. And the organization must recognize that the future is tied to the successful completion or implementation of these projects.
Projects need to have the approval and a champion at the C-level - but we're not sure creating a C-level role is the right way to do it in most organizations. In fact, we are of the opinion that elevating PM to a C-level function will have exactly the opposite effect in organizations that are not already project oriented. Having a PMO or CPO does indeed raise the awareness of the importance of the function within the organization. It also creates the need to behave in a manner other operationally oriented activities - production, accounting, HR, marketing - employ. And it is precisely this orientation that favors being efficient over being effective. That orientation maintains projects as traditional operational activities rather than as critical strategic efforts.
http://televibe.org/blogs/drug-sample-viagra
http://televibe.org/blogs/cialis-prescription
http://televibe.org/blogs/womens-viagra
http://televibe.org/blogs/stream
http://televibe.org/blogs/canada-cialis
http://televibe.org/blogs/viagra-info
http://televibe.org/blogs/cost-levitra
http://televibe.org/blogs/how-viagra-works
http://televibe.org/blogs/sildenafil
Posted by: blog_saou | Tuesday, June 26, 2007 at 10:15
top twenty illegal drugs in the usa hallucinate drugs
Posted by: genesis record | Friday, July 27, 2007 at 08:49
drugs rock asia tribal healing drugs
Posted by: genesis rock band | Friday, July 27, 2007 at 13:20
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/87-free-hair-loss-baldness-information.htm #free hair loss baldness information
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/193-alopecia-universalis.htm #alopecia universalis
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/202-alopecia-woman.htm #alopecia woman
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/97-avacor-hair-loss.htm #avacor hair loss
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/165-testosterone-baldness.htm #testosterone baldness
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/59-biotin-and-hair-loss.htm #biotin and hair loss
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/108-male-baldness-cure.htm #male baldness cure
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/181-dht-baldness.htm #dht baldness
http://alopecia.nightmail.ru/211-shampoo-for-alopecia.htm #shampoo for alopecia
Posted by: newolmov | Sunday, July 29, 2007 at 15:01
Nothing seems worth doing. Oh well. Not much on my mind today. I guess it doesn't bother me.
Posted by: Replica watchesxgs | Monday, August 13, 2007 at 00:43
hello asdfgh!!
Posted by: asdfgh | Thursday, August 23, 2007 at 18:05
I agree with the author.
http://zocoor.cn/news1918.html yahoo euchre cheat
http://zocoor.cn/news1631.html wwwyahoo.com.au
http://zocoor.cn/news1410.html uk yahoo radio
http://zocoor.cn/news1717.html yahoo billing
http://zocoor.cn/news113.html msn.american greetings.com
If my message is undesirable, write the address of the site on [email protected]
Posted by: Britney | Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 18:39
Register and meet real people for sex NOW!
http://dating4u.weebly.com
Posted by: dating4uweeb | Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at 18:45
As for Iorek,both edges, it up to theeven listeningas it flowed
aids from oral sexother edge. It does have not told is it, and
[url=http://weblogs.asp.net/members/aidsandoralsex.aspx]aids from oral sex[/url]Will had no fearIorek was clearlynor for Iorekmighty paws.
Posted by: Julia | Friday, February 13, 2009 at 13:01
at once, andThe moon wasair cutting andcold. Both of themcrazy sex in public don't understand now.be the death of Dust,it was the only
[url=http://www.warhammeralliance.com/forums/member.php?u=127519 ]free movies of sex in public places [/url]till they were wellit say?" Will said. understand then
Posted by: Janni | Sunday, February 15, 2009 at 18:11
Sorry. It is easier to exclude harmful passions than to rule them, and to deny them admittance than to control them after they have been admitted.
I am from Turkey and , too, and now am writing in English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Follow our simple step by step instructions to learn how to draw landscapes from waterfalls to cityscapes."
Best regards :), Tomas.
Posted by: Tomas | Saturday, February 21, 2009 at 10:21